LBJ’s 'War on Poverty' turns 50: Is America losing the war?

OPINION - January 8 marks the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson’s iconic War on Poverty. Sadly, half a century later, a new war is needed more than ever...

Luther Vandross was outed as gay after his death.

Unfortunately, over the years politicians have waged a war against anti-poverty programs and have scapegoated the poor themselves.  In 1988, President Ronald Reagan—who had scored political points by conjuring up the image of the black “welfare queen” getting rich from government handouts—declared that poverty won and the war was over.   Further, in August 1996 President Bill Clinton said that “Today, we are ending welfare as we know it” when he signed a bill ending the federal guarantee of cash assistance to the poor and turning over welfare to the states.

Now, welfare is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families or TANF.  Two-thirds of poor children received welfare in the mid-1990s.  Today that number has fallen to 27 percent.  What’s worse is that 6 million people have no other source of income other than food stamps.  The U.S. safety net is far less generous and less comprehensive than that of other nations and, as a result, America is not as effective at fighting poverty and inequality as it could.  This is why poverty is higher in the U.S. than in other prosperous nations.

And poverty in America remains high—very high in fact, at 50 million people (including 13 million children) or 16 percent, the highest rate since President Johnson was in office.  In 1964 the poverty rate was 19 percent, and in 1969 it had fallen to 12.1 percent.  In addition, 100 million Americans, or 1 in 3, live at twice the poverty level, which is $23,000 for a family of four.

Fifty years after the War on Poverty, U.S. economic inequality is now the highest since 1928, thanks to policies that have redistributed income at the expense of the poor.  In 1928, the top 1 percent of families made 23.9 percent of the income.  In 1944, this fell to 11.3 percent, with the bottom 90 percent receiving 67.5 percent.  In 2012, the top 1 percent claimed 22.5 percent, and the bottom 90 percent fell below 50 percent (49.6) for the first time in history.

Unfortunately, in post-recession America, the majority of new jobs are low paying, and wages have been stuck for the bottom half of workers since 1973.  Further, 20.5 million people earn incomes below half the poverty line, a disturbing increase of 8 million since 2000.  Union membership has steadily dropped over the years, and millennials are stuck in a low wage existence, shut out of the middle class with enormous student debt to pay off.  However, a movement of low wage workers is calling for minimum wage hikes and calling out abusive employers, in the hopes of turning the tide of public opinion and changing socioeconomic policy.    

The circumstances in which America finds itself cry out for a War on Poverty 2.0.  Tackling endemic poverty and eradicating the structural inequities in society are necessary in order to allow the nation to live up to its full potential.  People need a more effective safety net, and good jobs with a living wage.  Is there enough political will to fight the war?  Possibly, but ultimately, it will take a national movement and public pressure to make that happen.

Follow David A. Love on Twitter at @davidalove

SHARE THIS ARTICLE