Facebook allowed hundreds of misleading ads about Biden, mail-in voting
Facebook has thus far removed 40 misleading ads about Joe Biden and the US Postal Service
Facebook has been no stranger to political controversy and now it’s now been revealed that the social media juggernaut allowed political advertisers to repeatedly create hundreds of misleading ads about Joe Biden and the US Postal Service that were targeted to swing-state voters.
According to CNN Business, in recent weeks, the ads which were primarily sponsored by a pro-Republican super PAC led by former Trump administration officials, were disseminated to voters in key states like Florida to Wisconsin. They were viewed more than 10 million times.
READ MORE: ESPN’s Jalen Rose calls for arrest in Breonna Taylor case during Eastern Conference finals
“We reject ads that include content which has been debunked on our platform by our fact-checking partners. We are reviewing these ads, which are now inactive, to determine if they should’ve been rejected,” Andy Stone, a Facebook spokesman, told CNN Business after their report was originally published.
But an analysis of Facebook’s ad transparency data by the activist group Avaaz found that not only did Facebook fail to enforce its own platform rules less than two months before Election Day, some of the damaging ads are also still being run to this day.
READ MORE: Biden campaign to run ad during every NFL game until Election Day
In terms of money spent and impressions received, Avaaz’s analysis identified two super PACs as the most egregious offenders: pro-Trump group America First Action, and the pro-Democratic group Stop Republicans.
Even though Facebook has removed about 40 of the misleading advertisements by the time Avaaz raised their concerns with internal company moderators this week, it’s worth noting that represented less than 10% of the total identified by the group’s research.
Fadi Quran, campaign director at Avaaz, said many of the surviving ads were almost identical to the ones Facebook took down, which means that although the company understands what type of content is problematic, there appears to be a lack of urgency in addressing the issue.
“The objective question is, ‘Is Facebook as a platform protecting and informing US citizens during this election, or are its policies as they exist today causing more harm and allowing malicious users to weaponize it?'” said Quran. “Objectively trying to answer that question, our findings indicate Facebook could be doing so much more by applying its policies.”
Have you subscribed to theGrio’s podcast “Dear Culture”? Download our newest episodes now!
More About:News