The Los Angeles chapter of the NAACP has been in the national spotlight as of late because of its tendency to hand awards to Donald Sterling, a man with a long and well-documented history of racial bias accusations against him.
In addition to awards in 2008 and 2009, the Los Angeles NAACP was set to give the Clippers owner yet another award this year but has since rescinded that opportunity due to the controversy over an audio recording that features a racist tirade from Sterling.
In light of the numerous racial bias lawsuits filed against Sterling over the years, a fact that is not in line with the mission of a 100-year old civil rights organization, some media outlets have speculated that the LA NAACP was in the business of giving awards to Sterling because of large financial contributions. It’s a logical assumption. After all, many non-profits give awards to their biggest donors.
The face of the NAACP chapter in question is its president, Leon Jenkins, and in an April 28th press conference, Jenkins denied that there were any large contributions from Sterling. Jenkins refused to say how much money Sterling gave but did note that it was not a lot of money.
“It’s an insignificant amount of money and we’re going to return it,” said Jenkins.
But if Sterling has not given copious amounts of money to the LA NAACP, on what basis would the organization give such a man multiple honors? Sterling’s “gifts” of scholarships, Clippers tickets for youth organizations and money to various other non-profits hardly seem worthy of a lifetime achievement award when measured against decades of words and actions that are in direct conflict with the NAACP’s mission.
“There is a personal, economic and social price that Mr. Sterling must pay for his attempt to turn the clock back on race relations,” said Jenkins from a prepared statement. “If these statements are not who Mr. Sterling is, then he should spend the appropriate time necessary proving to the African-American community that these words don’t reflect who he is, or who he wishes to become.”
It’s not clear what economic price should be paid and to whom, but Jenkins is someone who knows a thing or two about redemption and overcoming a public scandal. Twenty years ago, he had a controversy of his own.
Teflon Leon
Leon Jenkins, a native of Los Angeles who was raised in Tennessee, was admitted to practice law in Michigan in 1979 and in California in 1980. In 1984, Jenkins was appointed a 36th District Court judge in Detroit. In 1991, the Michigan Supreme Court removed him from the bench and revoked his law license.
The court found that between 1984 and 1987, Jenkins had “systematically and routinely sold his office and his public trust, . . . committed wholesale violations of the most elementary canons of judicial con-duct, and brought grave dishonor upon this state’s judiciary.”
Jenkins was accused of numerous misdeeds, including accepting bribes to fix traffic tickets, using a different address to lower his car insurance payments, and directing a person to commit perjury during his federal investigation. Despite an FBI surveillance video of Jenkins accepting cash bribes from an FBI informant, Jenkins was found not guilty in two federal racketeering trials.
Another Disbarment
A free man, but disbarred from practicing law in Michigan, Jenkins moved back to his native Los Angeles and practiced law there. Even at that time in the early 1990s, Jenkins was heavily involved with local NAACP chapter, and his law practice was mostly devoted to personal injury, police brutality and wrongful death.
In 1991, a 15-year-old named Latasha Harlins was shot in the back of the head and killed by a Korean grocer over a bottle of orange juice in Los Angeles. The shooter, Soon Ja Du, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter but served no jail time, instead receiving five years probation. The sentence was handed down about five months before the LA Riots and surely contributed to the increasing racial tensions that led up to the riots. Jenkins represented Harlins’s family in a wrongful death lawsuit, and in 1992, a $300,000 settlement was paid to the family.
However, even with high profile cases, numerous pro-bono hours logged and no disciplinary issues in California, Jenkins was disbarred in California in 2001. California statutes allow disciplinary proceedings in other jurisdictions to be considered in its own proceedings. Jenkins admitted to improperly handling some citations but insisted that the Michigan charges were more fluff than substance.
The California State Bar Court believed otherwise and stated that “The Michigan Supreme Court independently reviewed the record of Michigan judicial disciplinary proceedings, finding respondent culpable of corrupt and improper judicial conduct on ‘overwhelming evidence.’ . . . [Jenkins] has shown no constitutional unfairness, and his culpability found in Michigan would compel a finding of culpability in California.” In conclusion, the court found that Jenkins “failed to demonstrate that he understands the magnitude and severity of his misconduct found in the Michigan decision to revoke his law license.”
Post Law Life
After once again losing his law license, Jenkins turned his attention full-time to the NAACP and was first elected president of the LA chapter in 2008. According to a 2011 bio in the LA Sentinel, Jenkins is also involved in “real estate investments, sales and financing.” That brings us to today, a time in which all three of the awards intended for Sterling (two given, one rescinded) have been during Jenkins’s tenure as LA NAACP chapter president.
A Call to Leadership
The Sterling incident has not only put the spotlight on racism in all of its ugly forms but also puts black leadership front and center as well. While rappers, athletes, Al Sharpton, President Obama and even Oprah have weighed in on the controversy, much criticism has been hoisted upon the LA NAACP chapter because of its past accolades for a known racist and the handling of the current situation. The NAACP long ago lost its image as a fearless lion protecting the civil rights of black people.
As it searches for a new national president, this Sterling controversy is not doing the organization any favors.
Leon Jenkins has proven to be a resilient man when it comes to re-inventing himself and overcoming his own professional obstacles. Can he use that same resilience and tenacity to step up and take real action against racism even (perhaps especially) when that racism comes in the form of a conveniently generous, wealthy white man?
What do you think the LA NAACP chapter should do about the Donald Sterling controversy?
Follow Demetria Irwin on Twitter at @Love_Is_Dope and connect with her on Facebook.