Are you a race-baiter?

Credit: (Adobe Stock Images)

(Adobe Stock Images)

Editor’s note: The following article is an op-ed, and the views expressed are the author’s own. Read more opinions on theGrio.  

Have you ever been accused of engaging in identity politics? Do white people frequently assume that you’re a professional race card player? Do you have a talent for baiting racists?

For years, talking about race has been frowned upon by Fox News analysts, conservatives, and people who “don’t care whether you are Black, white, or purple.” Although violet Americans have rarely weighed in on the issue, anyone who mentions race risks being classified as a “race baiter.”  

But what is race-baiting?

Also known as “playing the race card” and “identity politics,” race-baiting is an accusation usually leveled by white people who are skilled at clutching pearls. Discussing Black people, Asians, Hispanics, or any of the other demographics that compose the multiracial democracy is allowed — as long as they don’t make white people uncomfortable. But if you talk about racism, white supremacy or discrimination, you are out of order

To be clear, it is perfectly fine to talk about race — as long as they are not about the white race. 

For instance, news outlets routinely characterized the 2020 demonstrations over the death of George Floyd as “Black Lives Matter protests” even though they were not organized by one organization. Yet, referring to the Jan. 6 insurrections as “white protests” might get you tagged as a “race-baiter.” It is fine to talk about the history of African-Americans. But teaching about the stuff that white people did could get you banned from teaching because “Black history” is fine, white history is “uncomfortable.”

Aside from the salty flow of white tears, an objective measurement for race-baiting has always eluded sociologists, political scientists and people who know what “MLK would have wanted.” Thankfully, the researchers at theGrio Institute for Racial Equity and Diversity (TIRED) have teamed up with the Organization For Worldwide Home for International Truth, Equity & Solidarity (OFWHITES) to create a handy-dandy quiz that will allow anyone to determine whether their conversation could slide into the zone known as “race-baiting.” 

1. I am:

2. Do you see race?

3. A majority-Black neighborhood is called:

4. A majority-white neighborhood is called:

5. Which one of these would Martin Luther King Jr. not condemn?

6. It is perfectly fine to vote for someone who shares your:

7. How do you describe the people who voted for Donald Trump in 2020?

8. Who owned slaves?

9. Which one of these facts is considered “critical race theory” is incorrect?

10. Which of the following is a race-based policy?

11. What was the cause of the Civil War?

12. The Republican Party is made of:

13. Which one of the following is “playing the victim”?

14. Who is responsible for systemic racism?

15. Which of these subjects is “controversial” or “racially charged”?

16. Is America a racist country?

17. Which one of these is true?

18. Which of these movements had the support of the majority of white Americans?

19. If you combined all of Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches, books and articles, how many times did he talk about a “colorblind” society? 

20. Which of the following subjects can be comprehensively discussed without talking about race?

Answer key

The answers don’t matter. 

Unfortunately, the only way to avoid being branded as a race-baiter is to completely ignore the subject of racism, inequality and white supremacy altogether. 

And that’s why Sen. Tim Scott is a role model.


Michael Harriot is an economist, cultural critic and championship-level Spades player. His New York Times bestseller Black AF History: The Unwhitewashed Story of America is available everywhere books are sold.

Never miss a beat: Get our daily stories straight to your inbox with theGrio’s newsletter.

Exit mobile version