I’m beginning to wonder if former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney understands what it takes to become the president of the United States. Given the recent turn of events in his campaign, I could make a credible argument that the Republican presidential candidate simply cannot persuade a majority of voters that he’s in the race to win. Why? Well, he can’t explain why he wants to win—a fundamental prerequisite for the job.
Indeed, he’s twisted himself into such a pretzel largely to appeal to the narrowest slice of the undecided electorate as well as his conservative base that it’s almost as if he’s stopped actually believing in anything at all. If he loses the election, it will be an affirmation that most Americans don’t embrace the harshest and most extreme brand of conservative ideas, but it will also be a judgment on Gov. Romney’s increasingly apparent lack of commitment to any one overarching ideal beyond personal ambition. He doesn’t seem very committed to anything, which is why he’s having such a hard time trying to persuade voters that even he believes what he’s saying and doing.
Related: Why Obama is an increasingly strong favorite in the presidential race
Consider, for example, the short list of bungles, mishaps, and discoveries occurring in the span of days following the Republican National Convention, a time when most nominees are basking in the afterglow of a post-convention “bounce” in national polls. Not Gov. Romney, who has spent valuable campaign time batting back self-inflicted, negative news stories:
- The Republican nominee tried and failed to seize the political high ground last week in the wake of a fatal attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya. Without knowing all the facts of the situation, Gov. Romney accused the Obama administration of apologizing for American values as the attacks were unfolding. In fact, the White House had done nothing of the sort, prompting even fellow Republicans to criticize his effort to politicize an international crisis.
- A Politico story detailing finger pointing and in-fighting within the Romney camp rocked the campaign at the start of this week. The story overshadowed the campaign’s effort to jumpstart the campaign with a renewed messaging effort aimed at the middle class.
- Then, as if to dump salt into a gaping wound, the magazine Mother Jones released a video that showed Romney disparaging nearly half the citizens of the nation he wants to lead. In the discreetly filmed video, the candidate tells a group of very wealthy contributors that 47 percent of the nation will vote for President Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, because those voters are freeloaders who pay no taxes, who don’t assume responsibility for their lives, and who think government should take care of them.
None of this demonstrates a commitment to any single political ideology so much as a series of crass calculations about political expediency
A despairing right-wing pundit, Laura Ingraham, took to the airwaves of her nationally syndicated show last week to lament what Gov. Romney is doing to the Republican Party.
“If you can’t beat Barack Obama with this record, then shut down the party. Shut it down, start new, with new people. Because this is a gimme election, or at least it should be. Election after election, we hire people who have lost previous campaigns, who have run campaigns that have failed, who have messaged campaigns where the message fell flat, and they keep getting re-hired.”
Rush Limbaugh was equally morbid on his show:
If Obama wins, let me tell you what it’s the end of: The Republican Party. There’s gonna be a third party that’s gonna be oriented toward conservatism. . . . And I know if Obama wins, the Republican Party is gonna try to maneuver things so conservatives get blamed.
I find myself in partial agreement with Ingraham and Limbaugh. An Obama victory in November will compel the Republican Party to reassess itself and its reliance on wing-nut ideology. Otherwise, the Republican Party will die.
My guess is that, regardless of the outcome this year, the extremists within the Republican ranks will be excised and a more centrist conservative movement will emerge by the time the 2016 election rolls around. The lesson of this campaign is becoming clearer as Election Day nears. Appealing to the wild-eyed fanatics in the Tea Party leaves no path for the Republicans to capture the White House. Romney will have proven that trying to appeal to the Tea Party and moderate Americans at the same time doesn’t work.
Already, the finger pointing at Gov. Romney has begun. But dumping the blame on the candidate is a mistake—one that conservative pundits and activists have yet to comprehend. As blogger Paul Abrams makes clear in a recent posting on Huffington Post, any post-election blame that’s focused exclusively on Gov. Romney’s campaign missteps will be a denial of the changing political world that doesn’t embrace harsh, hard-core conservative ideas.
“For all their absurdities, campaigns have a way of dispelling some illusions, and so Republicans’ bigger problems than Romney’s flaws are their policies coming face-to-face with the world as it is,” Abrams writes of the conservatives who have pushed Gov. Romney to embrace views that are unpalatable to the majority of Americans. “So, the Republican strategists need to lay off Romney. . . . [C’]mon boys-and-girls on the Right, at least he was trying to sell your claptrap. And, therein, lay their dilemma.
“It is not Mitt Romney, flawed as he is,” he argues. “It is in themselves.”
Sam Fulwood III is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. His work with the Center’s Progress 2050 project examines the impact of policies on the nation when there will be no clear racial or ethnic majority by the year 2050.