Family of a Black man killed by California deputy awarded $33.5 million

Nathanael Pickett was shot and killed by a San Bernardino County sheriff's deputy in 2015. (The Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo) thegrio.com
Nathanael Pickett was shot and killed by a San Bernardino County sheriff's deputy in 2015. (The Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo)

The family of a black man wrongly killed by a California sheriff’s deputy was awarded $33.5 million in a civil rights trial.

According to the LATimes, the jury briefly deliberated before awarding the parents of Nathaniel Harris Pickett Jr., the huge amount; finding that Deputy Kyle Woods made up a series of conflicting and false narratives about an altercation between him and Nathaniel Harris Pickett.

–Flight from Hell: Black man’s hilarious fight against white woman’s feet goes viral–

“It’s the jury’s way of saying they will not tolerate the continued police shootings of unarmed people. The message it sends is that unjustified shootings will not be tolerated,” said Dale Galipo, a veteran civil rights attorney who represented the family.

Pickett, who was reportedly mentally ill, had just moved into a hotel and was trying to avoid the deputy in 2015. The LA Times reports that Pickett started running and Woods pursued him, believing that Pickett was trespassing on the Motel property. The lawsuit alleges that Pickett fell and was trying to move away from Woods when the deputy shot him in the chest.

–The definitive and final post on why Bruno Mars isn’t cultural appropriation–

Galipo said, “[The county] tried to sell a story to the jury about how the incident happened that the jury realized, through the presentation of evidence, was not true.”

However, the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office disagreed and claimed the that the shooting was justified.

The court found that the deputy was negligent by unlawfully detaining Pickett, denying him timely medical care and using deadly force, according to federal court records.

Lisa Bonet opens up about Bill Cosby’s “sinister” energy and karmic justice —

“We strongly disagree with the outcome based on the evidence in this case,” sheriff’s Lt. Sarkis Ohannessian said in a statement. “Our attorneys, the department and the county, will be discussing appealing the jury’s award.”

 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE